+1 914 979 2828
+1 914 979 2828

Grand theory conceptual framework

Paper details:
Apply a conceptual framework focused on advanced nursing roles.
Nursing science is developed through the work of nurse scientists and theorists who describe and explain what nursing is and what nurses do. Important to
the development of nursing science are the foundational structures of nursing:
The metaparadigm of nursing
Nursing metatheory and nursing philosophies
Nursing theories, which range from all-encompassing conceptual frameworks and macro grand theories to micro level theories used in practice.
Conceptual frameworks and grand theories of nursing, which are more abstract, give the disciple a unique perspective of the metaparadigm concepts and
provide a path for more concrete theory development.
In this assessment, you are going to locate a conceptual framework or grand theory that you could use in advanced nursing practice. After explaining it, you
will then describe how your chosen conceptual framework or grand theory of nursing relates to each of the metaparadigm concepts of person/client, nurse,
health, and environment as described by the theorist. Lastly, you will apply the conceptual framework or grand theory to advanced nursing roles. In particular,
how does this conceptual framework or grand nursing theory apply to advanced nursing practice, education, and research?
Assessment Details
1. Introduce the reader to the content of this paper with an introductory paragraph.
2. Briefly describe the conceptual framework or grand nursing theory.
3. Briefly describe the metaparadigm of nursing.
4. Explain how the metaparadigm concepts are used by the theorist in the conceptual framework or grand nursing theory.
5. Project how this conceptual framework or grand nursing theory can be used in advanced nursing roles.
6. Finish your paper with a concluding paragraph.
3-4 pages APA 7th edition
Psych mental health NP

Sample Solution


There has been impressive discussion about the meaning of the various terms — hypothesis, hypothetical system, and reasonable structure, with Risjord (2019) suggesting that “model” be utilized rather than “hypothesis” for center reach speculations. The agreement among creators is that hypothetical and applied structures are more dynamic than speculations. Applied systems interface ideas in significant ways yet are typically not viewed as completely created as hypothetical structures. This leads some to state that the improvement of applied structures is a vital stage in the advancement of hypotheses (Meleis, 2018). Other attendant scholars view theoretical structures as undifferentiated from fabulous hypotheses (McEwen, 2019b). Still others utilize the terms reciprocally (Meleis, 2018). Eventually, Meleis suggests that the discussion over the significance of these terms is a scholarly issue of “semantics” (p. 123), which not just has prompted disarray inside the discipline, yet in addition has postponed progress in the advancement of hypotheses helpful to research and practice. Meleis recommends that the utilization of the expression “hypothesis” is adequate.

A hypothesis (or hypothetical system) is a “set of legitimately interrelated ideas, explanations, recommendations, and definitions” (McEwen, 2019a, p. 28), which presents an efficient perspective on a peculiarity from which one might get clarification on some pressing issues and indicate relations among factors to depict, make sense of, or potentially anticipate peculiarities and endorse activities (McEwen, 2019a; Peterson and Bredow, 2017). Hypotheses help characterize and separate a discipline, make sense of occasions, structure, and put together information, guide APRNs by recognizing the objectives and results of training, and add to a normal practice that inquiries and approves instinct and suspicions.

After some time, there has been extensive discussion about whether nursing ought to just utilize hypotheses created by and for nursing or could likewise utilize speculations that were created in different disciplines. The reasoning for the previous is that hypotheses assist with characterizing the limits of a discipline. All in all, hypotheses created by and for attendants articulate the motivation behind nursing and recognize nursing mediations and exploration that utilization speculations created inside nursing that add to the advancement of nursing information. The inescapable utilization of non-nursing speculations in examination and practice loans backing to the statement that the beginning of the hypothesis is less significant than the hypothesis’ commonsense utility. The people who find the utilization of hypotheses created in disciplines other than nursing (acquired speculations) adequate affirm that information isn’t bound to a specific discipline, yet rather is accessible to all. Also, in this day of interdisciplinary examination and practice, information and speculations are shared inside a group; hypotheses give a typical language to approach exploration and practice. As an applied discipline, attendants use information from the physical and sociologies. In like manner, speculations created inside nursing may likewise contain ideas shared by different disciplines. At the end of the day, the limits that different disciplines may not be unbending and impervious. Whenever speculations from different disciplines are utilized in examination or practice, they ought to be reliable with a nursing viewpoint, and no matter what the term utilized or whether nursing or acquired hypotheses are utilized, a hypothesis should be significant and important (McEwen and Wills, 2019).

Characterization OF THEORIES

There are two significant approaches to characterizing speculations. The first is by scope and the second is by reason (McEwen, 2019b). This segment centers around these two significant groupings.


Scope alludes to the broadness of peculiarities enveloped by the hypothesis and is related with the level of hypothetical dynamics. As far as extension, a hypothesis might be delegated fantastic, center reach, or practice/circumstance explicit. Amazing speculations center around wide region of a discipline. In nursing, the fantastic hypotheses make sense of peculiarities of focal worry for nursing, for example, the meta-worldview ideas of individual, wellbeing, nursing, and climate. Fantastic hypotheses integrate exceptionally theoretical ideas that frequently need functional definitions. In this way, the suggestions are not viewed as available to testing (McEwen, 2019b). In any case, there is proof that amazing hypotheses are utilized as structures for nursing research (Im and Chang, 2012). A few models incorporate the Neuman Systems Model (Yarcheski et al., 2010), Watson’s Theory of Human Caring (Gillespie et al., 2012), and Orem’s Self-Care Theory (Peters and Templin, 2010).

Center reach speculations are more engaged and restricted in scope than stupendous hypotheses. Center reach hypotheses incorporate a set number of ideas that will generally be more concrete than those found in excellent speculations. Consequently, the ideas can ordinarily be functionally characterized. The hypothetical properties are more unambiguous and available to testing than those found in great hypotheses (McEwen, 2019b). There has been a huge development in the improvement of center reach speculations (Peterson and Bredow, 2017). One explanation might be their materialness to both exploration and practice. One hypothesis that has been utilized in exploration and practice is the Transitions Theory (e.g., Stixrood, 2019). Momentarily, Meleis and associates portray the sorts and properties of changes individuals experience, the circumstances that work with or restrain development through advances, interaction and result pointers, and nursing intercessions (Meleis et al., 2000).

Center reach hypotheses might be created in more ways than one (Im, 2018; Liehr and Smith, 2017; Peterson and Bredow, 2017). They might be created from great speculations (e.g., Pickett et al., 2014), non-nursing hypotheses (e.g., Pender et al., 2011), surveys of the writing (e.g., Spratling and Weaver, 2012), research (e.g., Baydoun et al., 2018; Walter, 2017), a blend of exploration and writing audits (e.g., Siaki et al., 2013), or clinical practice (Liehr and Smith, 2017; Peterson and Bredow, 2017). For instance, a hypothesis of weight the executives was created from Orem’s Theory of Self-Care (Pickett et al., 2014). Significant parts of this center reach hypothesis of weight the board are weight the executives logical elements, weight the board office, and weight the board ways of behaving Spratling and Weaver (2012) fostered a hypothetical system of flexibility in medicinally delicate youths from audits of the gamble and versatility writing in this populace. Sanford et al. (2011) fostered a hypothetical model of decision-production in cardiovascular breakdown from their grounded hypothesis investigation of the manners in which parental figures of individuals with cardiovascular breakdown simply decide. Siaki et al. (2013) built a center reach hypothesis of chance discernment from their amalgamation of the writing and subjective and quantitative information from an investigation of Samoan Pacific Islanders who were at high gamble for creating diabetes and cardiovascular infection. At last, Riegel et al. (2019) extended their Middle-Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness by integrating information from models and hypotheses connected with sickness side effects.

Circumstance explicit or practice hypotheses are the most engaged and least complex speculations. Circumstance explicit speculations contain a predetermined number of ideas that are effortlessly characterized and make sense of a little part of the real world. Circumstance explicit hypotheses will more often than not be prescriptive (McEwen, 2019b). Dissimilar to terrific or center reach speculations that are generalizable across populaces and circumstances, circumstance explicit hypotheses are most pertinent in unambiguous settings. Circumstance explicit hypotheses are restricted to explicit populaces or specific areas of interest and take sociopolitical, social, and verifiable settings into thought (Im and Meleis, 2018). Circumstance explicit speculations might be created from center reach hypotheses, exploration, and practice (Peterson and Bredow, 2017). An illustration of a circumstance explicit hypothesis is the Asian Immigrant Menopausal Symptom (AIMS) hypothesis (Im, 2010). This hypothesis was created utilizing an integrative methodology of writing amalgamation and examination and depicts the cycle by which Asian ladies progress through menopause and the elements that impact how Asian ladies experience menopause and the side effects they experience.


Speculations might be named unmistakable, informative, prescient, or prescriptive. Elucidating speculations depict or name ideas, properties, and aspects, however don’t make sense of how the ideas in the hypothesis are connected. Engaging speculations will generally be produced from illustrative exploration, for example, idea investigations, contextual analyses, writing audits, overviews, phenomenology, or grounded hypothesis research (McEwen, 2019b). Informative hypotheses portray affiliations or connections among ideas or suggestions, making sense of how and why these ideas are connected. These examinations are created utilizing correlational exploration or top to bottom audits of the writing (McEwen, 2019b). Prescient hypotheses depict the connections among ideas and the circumstances under which specific results will happen. These speculations are produced and tried utilizing research plans, for example, pretest, posttest, semi exploratory, and test plans (McEwen, 2019b). Prescriptive speculations recommend intercessions that will accomplish a specific result and are believed to be the most significant level in principle improvement (McEwen, 2019b).